Freddy
-
Total Posts
:
150
- Joined: 11/3/2008
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Exaggerated apophaticism
-
5/6/2009 6:26 AM
( #14 )
Quote by Phil St. Romain: Following up on other discussions about nonduality, Bernadette Roberts, etc., I am hoping that this topic will explore what we mean by Apophatic Christian spirituality, and how it is different from the apophatic mysticisms we find in Buddhism, Taoism, etc. But what do we mean by "apophatic Christian spirituality?" See [link=http://weekendfisher.blogspot....ch-of-mysticism.html]http://weekendfisher.bl.......ch-of-mysticism.html[/link] for a good introduction. quote: Apophatic Mysticism is rooted in humility about what we can know and the realization that all of our systems are, after all, completely unable to do justice to an understanding of God. Its basic premise is that, no matter how great the human mind, it simply cannot grasp God in all His fullness, all His glory, all His might. This view is grounded in Scripture, reason, and the history of the church. Scripture's teaching that we do not yet know fully also has implications for systematic theologies. quote: Our mental images or artwork -- or systematic logical images -- can point us in the right direction if they reflect God and if we remember that they are not fully accurate pictures of God. The apophatic approach looks at each thing and consciously reminds itself, "Neither is this image fully like God." Ignorance leads to humility and to continual striving for better knowledge. Assumption of knowledge has the opposite effect. quote: If the "unknowing" approach becomes an exercise in denying what we know then it has gone too far. If it remains an exercise in acknowledging that "we know in part, we prophesy in part ... now we see through a glass, darkly" then it is a healthy corrective to our boasting of having a complete knowledge (or complete "systematic theology" if you'd rather). That's a good intro. I'll continue the reflection below. Posts: 7539 | Location: Wichita, KS | Registered: 09 August 2001   Phil Posted 01 March 2009 04:52 PM Hide Post Apophatic spirituality is often called "negative spirituality," or "negative theology," in that it seeks to know God as the mystery beyond words, images, symbols, rituals, etc. "Kataphaic spirituality/theology" encounters God through these means and so affirms positive knowledge about God -- that we really can say something about who God is, how God operates, etc. In Christianity, our tradition of revelation lends itself to a strong kataphatic emphasis. Christ has come and has made God visible to us; we celebrate this ritually and sacramentally; we sing about it, write books, read Scripture, etc. -- and encounter God in some manner through these means and actions. "Positive" knowledge. Apophatic spirituality and theology stands as a corrective to this, reminding us that although we do indeed know something positive, there is a great deal more than we don't know -- that the mystery of God goes far beyond what we do know, and that even our most exalted dogmas are a stammering rife with temptations to think that we understand something that goes far beyond our understanding. In short, kataphatic spirituality/theology orients our human faculties to the God who has been revealed, and enables us to encounter God through the medium of creation, liturgy, art, Sacrament, sacred word, etc. Apophatic spirituality invites us to be open to encounter the God whose mystery goes beyond all these visible, tangible means of knowledge. Obviously, this is not meant to be a matter of either/or; one needs both. An extreme emphasis on the kataphatic aspect leads to fundamentalism, dogmatism, and egoic arrogance concerning the things of God; extreme apophaticism leads to quietism, gnosticism, and usually theological pluralism. Posts: 7539 | Location: Wichita, KS | Registered: 09 August 2001   Ignored post by Phil posted 01 March 2009 04:52 PM Show Post Phil Posted 01 March 2009 05:00 PM Hide Post Traditionally, Christian contemplation has been considered an example of apophatic mysticism. Why? Because it gives testimony to an encounter with God that is not mediated through active engagement with word, symbol, etc., though it is often experienced during or after such activities. Rather, contemplation is the experience of God communicating with us "spirit-to-spirit," as it were, in a depth of our being beyond the activities of the faculties. It is pure grace because we cannot reach God in this manner through the exercise of our will or intellect; it is God who reaches to us. We might or might not experience activity in our faculties -- even distractions -- but these are no impediments to contemplation unless we close ourselves off at the level of the will to God's self-communication. Contemplation does leave us free to do so; it is not a matter of become possessed by God over-and-against our permission. Posts: 7539 | Location: Wichita, KS | Registered: 09 August 2001   Ignored post by Phil posted 01 March 2009 05:00 PM Show Post Phil Posted 01 March 2009 05:10 PM Hide Post A common error one finds in the history of the tradition and even in this day uses this fallacious logic: 1. Apophatic spirituality holds that God exists beyond all thoughts, concepts, images, etc. 2. As long as I am having thoughts, images, etc., I cannot really be experiencing God, or contemplation. This line of reasoning is false because: a. We do encounter God through kataphatic means. b. Christian contemplative experience isn't premised on having no thoughts, images, etc. in one's consciousness, but on God's gracious offer of contemplative graces and our consent to receive such when offered. Unfortunately, points 1 and 2 are widely taught in linkage, and if pursued too vigorously, they lead to quietism and a kind of radical apophaticism that eventually makes no distinction between Christian apophatic mysticism and the apophatic spiritualities found in other religious traditions -- especially Buddhism and advaitan Hinduism. Apophatic spiritual practice becomes, then, a matter of striving to vanquish all thoughts, concepts, reflections, etc. as though the absence of such activities is either a pre-requisite to apophatic mystical experience, or the mystical experience itself. To my thinking, without the gift of contemplative grace, the consequence of such practice leads primarily to the refinement of one's own spiritual awareness, acute perception, and a deep sense of the interconnectedness of creation -- enlightenment-like mysticism. - - - OK, there, now, I've set the stage for questions, discussion, disagreements, etc. I'm hoping this thread wil
|